Financials. Model v3.0, September 2026
HomeBid charges for what it does: qualifying and verifying a buyer, then handing a transaction-ready deal to whoever completes it. The forecast is built from the bottom up, from developers, live sites, units and reservations, and every figure on this page is a live cell in the financial model.
Revenue model
Housebuilders pay for verified, transaction-ready reservations. HomeBid stops at bid acceptance. The panel firm or settlement rail completes.
Line one
A platform subscription for each live sales outlet: COINS-connected origination, listing and bid management, buyer qualification and the sales pack for every plot. Priced below a portal development listing.
Production. Charged from conversionLine two
Qualification and verification of every bidder on the plot: identity aligned with PG81, source of funds and source of wealth, PEP and sanctions screening, the 100-point AML risk score and the PDTF-conformant digital twin. Charged only when the developer accepts.
Production. Charged from conversionLine three
The verified-twin package delivered to the receiving conveyancer or rail at acceptance. Modelled at zero in 2027 and partial uptake after that, because nothing downstream is charged until a panel firm has ingested a package in the pilot.
Gated. Downstream ingestion unvalidatedNot in any scenario: conveyancing fees, reservation or completion percentages, search or insurance margins, mortgage referral income, API licensing or consumer fees. Phase 2 completion mechanics are parked and carry no revenue.
Pilot customer
A PE-backed London and Home Counties timber-frame housebuilder goes live in late October 2026. Its stated minimum volumes anchor Developer 1 in every scenario. Nothing else is contracted.
Forecast, Base case
Management forecast. Seed close March 2027. The pilot converts in May. Developers 2 and 3 sign in the second half of 2027. Fifteen developers and 61 live sites by the end of 2029.
| Base case | CY2027 | CY2028 | CY2029 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Developers signed, end of year | 3 | 9 | 15 |
| Active sites, end of year | 9 | 31 | 61 |
| Chargeable reservations | 162 | 643 | 1,379 |
| Platform subscriptions | £26k | £177k | £414k |
| Per-deal qualification and verification fees | £40k | £158k | £338k |
| Verified-twin handoff fees (gated) | 0 | £19k | £62k |
| Revenue | £66k | £354k | £814k |
| Gross margin | 58% | 83% | 88% |
| Operating costs, including 5% contingency | £616k | £919k | £956k |
| EBITDA | (£578k) | (£626k) | (£243k) |
| Closing cash | £1.36M | £735k | £492k |
| Headcount, FTE | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Exit run-rate ARR, December | £141k | £540k | £1.07M |
Q4 2026 is a three-month, pre-seed pilot stub with no revenue. Gross margin carries UK and EU hosting in cost of sales. Closing cash assumes a £2M raise net of 4% costs.
Scenarios
All three run through the same monthly engine. Base is the plan. Floor is the pilot customer alone. Upside adds faster signings and one Tier-1 housebuilder.
Floor
Base
Upside
Unit economics
Per accepted reservation
Per active site, steady state
Per developer
Sales are founder-led into existing COINS housebuilder relationships. No churn data exists yet, so lifetime is capped at five years for the illustration.
The ask
Use of funds is derived from the cost plan for the first 24 months after close, not allocated top-down.
Use of funds, first 24 months
Runway
Terms
Key assumptions
Monthly engine to December 2029. Three scenarios. Every assumption editable. Every source listed.